Into probability of making out into the target, there is a serious communications ranging from grandiose narcissism and you may new member sex, ? = .161, t = 2.819, p = .005. That it interaction is actually shown in Fig 2. The easy slopes for men (easy mountain = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you will female (easy slope = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) were not significant. Grandiose narcissists don’t show a heightened odds of making out that have a connected target more just a single one (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), suggesting you to definitely grandiose narcissism wasn’t associated with lover poaching having a primary-identity affair.

Grandiose narcissists often statement lover poaching -especially for this new quick-label . not, a concern remains about whether or not they look for members of matchmaking much more worthy of pursuing than simply those people who are solitary. Widman and you may McNulty reason why grandiose narcissistic tendencies will be triggered across issues normally (including Spanking Sites dating app the mind-declaration regarding lives prevalence off sexual decisions), although not be triggered whenever placed in a certain situation. Therefore, you’ll be able that grandiose narcissists divulge a history of entertaining into the partner poaching, but don’t necessarily get a hold of those in relationship to be most useful friends. I tested it possibility inside the four education.

Spouse poaching catalog.

For very long-identity companion poaching, grandiose narcissism is actually a critical predictor for females (? = .306, t = 2.623, p = .010) and you may a somewhat extreme predictor for males (? = .218, t = 1.725, p = .088). Not one of Large Five variables was tall. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t a serious predictor out-of success during the poaching to the much time-term for men (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), nonetheless it is for ladies (? = .340, t = dos.369, p = .021). Not one of your other variables were high apart from ladies’ neuroticism; when female was indeed a great deal more neurotic, it said far more achievement at poaching for some time-term intimate relationship.

Efficiency

Interesting, grandiose narcissism was not on the mate poaching one of males. So it outcome is in line with efficiency reported from the Kardum and you will associates . For this reason, it is possible you to definitely grandiose narcissistic women are more often accountable of companion poaching.

Information and you will processes

There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.