Research have been analysed using SPSS twenty-five.0. First detailed analyses was performed, in addition to Cronbach’s alphas and you may frequencies. Digital logistic regressions were utilized to evaluate connections ranging from sex, age, sexual orientation, having a romantic/sexual partner, SNS put, sexting normalisation and determination to engage in sexting due to the fact separate parameters, and also the five sexting habits as the founded parameters. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 is actually considered as a measure of perception proportions. All the variables were entered on design at exactly the same time. The study was also stratified of the sex.
Incidence from sexting habits
The most widespread sexting behaviours get (21.2%) and getting thru an intermediary (28.4%), followed by third-cluster forwarding of intimate blogs (9.3%) and you can, lastly, sending (8.1%). Detailed analytics get in the Desk 2.
New regression patterns had been extreme. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos is actually .42 into “sending” model, .31 into the “receiving” design, .23 with the “third-party forwarding” design, and you will .17 with the “acquiring thru a mediator” model (Desk 3:
About “sending” design, willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% rely on interval [CI]: 5.36-), having an enchanting/intimate companion (OR: step three.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), playing with Snapchat (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: step one.19-2.93), sexual direction (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: step one.04-step 3.00) and you will many years (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: 1.step 14-step one.63) was basically significantly related to giving engagement. In the “receiving” model, that have a romantic/intimate partner (OR: step three.dos7; 95% CI: dos.51-4.28), readiness to help you sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-3.89), having fun with Instagram (OR: step 1.89; 95% CI: 1.16-3.10), gender (OR: step 1.82; 95% CI: step 1.37-2.41), using Snapchat (OR: step one.6step one; 95% CI: step 1.dos1-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.49; 95% CI: 1.20-1.86) and many years (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.12-step 1.41) was in fact significantly about searching engagement.
In the “third-people forwarding” design, having fun with Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: step one.1six-6.51), willingness so you can sext (OR: dos.00; 95% CI: 1.48-2.72), gender (OR: step one.96; 95% CI: 1.3dos-dos.91), that have a romantic/sexual partner (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: step one.29-dos.68), using Fb (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: step 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: step 1.09-step 1.87) and you may years (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: 1.22-1.66) was in fact somewhat pertaining to wedding during the third-party forwarding.
About “choosing through an intermediary” model, using Instagram (OR: 2.16; 95% CI: step 1.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.84; 95% CI: step 1.5dos-dos.24), with an intimate/sexual partner (OR: step 1.71; 95% CI: 1.35-2.17), intercourse (OR: step 1.4step 1; 95% CI: step one.step onestep one-step 1.80) and you will many years (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: step 1.23-step 1.49) have been notably associated with wedding in getting thru an intermediary.
Sex variations
The fresh new regression designs was basically tall. Nagelkerke’s R 2 is actually .50 for females and you may .41 to own men with the “sending” model; .30 for women and .29 for boys into “receiving” model; .18 for women and you can .twenty four having guys towards the “third-group forwarding” model; and you may .14 for women and you can .twenty-two having men on “searching thru a mediator” model (Table 4:
Regarding “sending” model, for females, readiness to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), that have a romantic/intimate lover (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: 2.27-nine.09) and you will age (OR: step 1.60; 95% CI: step 1.17-2.20) had been rather connected with delivering involvement. To possess people, these were desire to help you sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: step 3.68-nine.94), with a romantic/intimate mate (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: step 1.59-4.88) and using Snapchat (OR: dos.38; 95% CI: 1.32-cuatro.29).
About “receiving” model, for girls, desire in order to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), playing with Instagram (OR: 4.34; 95% CI: step one.43-), that have an enchanting/intimate companion (OR: step three.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.62; 95% CI: 1.13-dos.33) and you can decades (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.step 17-step 1.72) have been significantly connected with researching engagement. To own people yhden Latvian ladys, they certainly were which have an intimate/intimate lover (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: dos.08-cuatro.25), determination so you can sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: step one.58-3.41), using Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: step 1.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: step one.06-step 1.86) and years (OR: step one.20; 95% CI: step 1.04-step 1.38).
